Pierre Poilievre accuses Mark Carney of weakness in dealing with Donald Trump, China

Where Are His Elbows?” Poilievre Takes Aim at Carney’s Leadership

Freshly re-entered into the House of Commons following his by-election victory in Battle River–Crowfoot on August 18, 2025, Pierre Poilievre is wasting no time. At a rally in Surrey, B.C., he fired a memorable barb: “Where are Mr. Carney’s elbows these days? He seems to have misplaced them.” The taunt—pointed, sharp, and suitably visual—marks a daring attack at Prime Minister Mark Carney, accusing him of being “silent and weak” in the face of mounting pressures from both Washington and Beijing. Ground News

The Finger-Point: Trump and China

Poilievre’s critique centers on Carney’s perceived softness on two prime threats:

• Donald Trump: With trade wars escalating and annexation talk still echoing in Canadian political discourse, Poilievre suggests Carney lacks the gumption to fight back effectively.

• China: As global tension over trade and geopolitical influence intensifies, Poilievre frames Carney’s response as lukewarm.

A Charged Political Comeback

Poilievre’s return to Parliament is dramatic. After losing his long-held Ottawa seat in April, he won 80.4% of the vote in his conservative Alberta riding on August 18, cementing his role as the Opposition leader in the House ReutersFinancial Times. Upon assuming his seat, he immediately seized the podium—and headlines—to challenge Carney’s leadership from the get-go.

The Stakes: Carney’s Tightrope

Mark Carney, only sworn in as Prime Minister in mid-March, inherited a fragile minority government amid swirling economic uncertainty and U.S. pressure The GuardianWikipedia+1. He’s taken steps like steering his party toward the center and calling for national unity amid provoking trade tensions PoliticoAP NewsWikipedia.

With Poilievre now vociferously opposing him inside Parliament—and wielding a fiery rhetorical flourish—Carney’s centrism may be tested more than ever.

Why It Matters

• Political Theatre: Poilievre’s “lost elbows” metaphor isn’t just clever—it’s theatrical. It encapsulates frustration over leadership perceived to be ineffectual in a time of crisis.

• Test of Resolve: With Carney under fire, his ability to respond—swiftly and decisively—could define his early months in office.

• A Strategic Distraction? Poilievre’s targeting of Trump and China might serve to shift focus from domestic economic concerns like inflation, housing, and budget deficits—persistent pressure points he’s expected to keep in the spotlight when Parliament resumes on September 15 Reuters.

Conclusion: Politics Meets Verbal Sparring

In an election environment still dominated by the specter of Donald Trump’s trade threats, Poilievre’s remarks offer a daring mix of humor and confrontation. Whether Carney responds with vigor—or continues his quieter, centrist approach—will be a defining moment in early Canadian politics under his leadership.

I’d love to hear your thoughts—do you think this rhetorical attack is smart political maneuvering, or will it backfire by distracting from real issues like affordability and infrastructure? Let me know!

Canada Pride - Vintage Style, Retro Canadian Maple Leaf Women's V-Neck T-Shirt

Get Now 

Canada’s Job Market Crisis: Young Graduates Struggle as Opportunities Dry Up

Canada is currently grappling with its most challenging job market in decades, particularly affecting young workers and recent graduates. The unemployment rate for postsecondary graduates under 25 has surged to 11.2% in early 2025, marking the highest level in over twenty years, excluding the pandemic period .@EconomicTimes

This economic downturn is exemplified by the experience of Emmersen Lashley, a 19-year-old political science student at Queen's University. Despite submitting over 90 job applications across various sectors, including retail and service industries, over the past two summers, she has not received a single job offer. This lack of employment opportunities is hindering her ability to save money and plan for future goals such as establishing a career and homeownership .@EconomicTimes

Economists attribute this bleak employment landscape to several factors, including economic headwinds and trade tensions, notably between Canada and the United States. These challenges are not only causing immediate employment difficulties but also pose long-term financial implications for young Canadians, potentially affecting their savings and career progression .@EconomicTimes

Financial experts emphasize the importance of early career employment for long-term financial stability. Desmond Nwaerondu, a certified financial planner at Sun Life, notes that time spent out of the workforce can significantly impact one's ability to save for retirement, necessitating increased savings later in life to achieve similar financial goals .@EconomicTimes+4@EconomicTimes+4@EconomicTimes+4

The current state of Canada's job market underscores the need for targeted policy interventions to support young workers and stimulate job creation. Addressing these challenges is crucial to prevent long-term economic repercussions and to ensure that the younger generation can achieve financial security and career fulfillment.@EconomicTimes

Trump-Carney Meeting: A New Chapter in Canada-U.S. Relations

A recent high-profile meeting in Washington has signaled the beginning of what many in Canada hope will be a renewed and more balanced relationship with the United States. In a gathering marked by personal rapport and cautious optimism, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump met in the Oval Office—a meeting that, while not resolving all ongoing disputes, has reset the tone of bilateral engagement during turbulent economic and political times.

Setting the Stage

Following a recent Canadian federal election, the newly elected government wasted no time in establishing its stance on economic sovereignty and trade negotiations. Carney’s visit to Washington was not designed to immediately strike a new deal on lingering issues like tariffs or trade imbalances. Instead, it was positioned as a deliberate move to begin laying the groundwork for a fresh bilateral relationship.

According to the transcript, Carney arrived in Washington amid praise from both sides of the political spectrum in Canada. Within the privacy of the Oval Office and later in the public sphere, both leaders conveyed a mutual respect that is seen as essential in recalibrating longstanding disputes.

The Washington Meeting: Behind Closed Doors

Though no immediate agreements were reached, observers have described the meeting as “a massive step forward” in establishing new foundations for Canada-U.S. relations. Prime Minister Carney’s performance was a significant talking point. Beyond diplomatic pleasantries, the meeting provided a platform for Carney to demonstrate his ability to engage constructively with President Trump—a contrast drawn even by Trump, who compared Carney favorably with former Canadian leaders.

Foreign Minister Mélanie Joly, a key member of the Canadian delegation, provided deeper insight during her post-meeting briefing. She emphasized that while the discussions did not yield direct outcomes—such as the removal of existing tariffs—they did lay down the essential groundwork for future negotiations. This approach, she explained, reflected a desire to construct a long-term strategy that would address both trade and security challenges in a coordinated, rather than ad hoc, manner.

Key Issues on the Table

Trade and Tariffs

One of the most pressing issues during the meeting was the tariff regime imposed by the United States—a subject that has impacted Canada’s economic landscape for some time. Despite the optimistic tone, President Trump maintained his stance on tariffs, reiterating that they would remain in place for now. The meeting did not mark the start of formal trade renegotiations, but it signaled that Canada’s economic concerns, particularly in sectors like the auto, steel, and aluminum industries, were being recognized at the highest level.

The dialogue was less about immediate tariff removal and more about building a partnership that can eventually relieve the economic pain felt by many Canadians. As Joly stressed, the objective is to move away from a piecemeal negotiation approach toward a more holistic and strategic deal that safeguards Canadian jobs and economic stability.

Sovereignty and National Identity

Another pivotal theme was Canadian sovereignty. In sharp contrast to President Trump’s occasional references to Canada as the “51st state,” Carney and Joly made it unequivocally clear that sovereignty is non-negotiable. Their messaging was blunt: Canada is not for sale. This sentiment was underscored when Carney summed up his position by dismissing any notion of merging into the U.S. political sphere. It is a stance that resonates deeply with Canadians, who are wary of any loss of national autonomy or undue dependency on American economic and political policies.

The Role of Personal Rapport

Diplomacy often hinges on personal relationships, and the meeting between Carney and Trump was no exception. Much was made of the fact that the leaders had a productive, engaging, and—even by some accounts—amicable interaction. Trump was reported to have offered praise, describing Carney as a “nice man” and commending his performance during the debates. This personal rapport is viewed as a crucial asset; with Trump being known as the final decision-maker, establishing trust and mutual respect could smooth the pathway for more substantive negotiations in the future.

Political and Economic Implications

The outcome of this meeting extends well beyond the confines of bilateral diplomacy—it has significant economic and political implications at home in both Canada and the United States.

Economic Pressures and Domestic Politics

On the economic front, tariffs remain a source of considerable pain for Canadian industries. The auto and manufacturing sectors, in particular, are feeling the impact. Carney’s visit comes at a time when Canada is trying to reduce its overdependence on the U.S. market by broadening its trade relationships with countries in Europe, Asia, and even the United Kingdom. By positioning himself as a strong negotiator who understands both diplomatic and domestic concerns, Carney aims to not only protect Canadian jobs but also to reassure families who are anxious about the economic fallout.

In Washington, Trump’s tariff strategy has sparked domestic discontent among American senators and voters alike. There is pressure on his administration to balance tough negotiation tactics with practical outcomes that benefit both sides. This meeting could be a precursor to a recalibration of U.S. trade policy if the personal rapport between the leaders leads to more cooperative economic discussions.

International Influence and Future Negotiations

Furthermore, the meeting is likely to impact the broader international diplomatic landscape. As Canada prepares for future high-profile engagements—most notably with the upcoming G7 summit where President Trump is expected to participate—the relationship dynamics set in Washington will serve as a template for future negotiations. The Canadian government intends to leverage this renewed relationship to foster closer ties with other global partners, establishing itself as a model of pragmatic negotiation amid global economic uncertainties.

Expert Commentary and Public Sentiment

The media commentary surrounding the meeting has been mixed but largely optimistic. Panel discussions among political analysts highlighted several key observations:

• Shift in Diplomatic Tone: Experts noted that the personal rapport and respectful exchange during the meeting mark a considerable shift from previous, more adversarial interactions. This new tone could be beneficial in diffusing long-standing tensions.

• Economic Realism: While there is hope for future tariff relief, analysts cautioned that substantial economic policies would require time, given the complexity of renegotiating trade agreements in the middle of political and economic turbulence.

• Domestic and International Pressures: Both sides face significant pressures—Canada from its voters demanding sovereignty and economic relief, and the U.S. from political factions wary of ongoing trade deficits and economic instability. Balancing these pressures will be a key challenge in the coming months.

Looking Ahead: The Road to Negotiation and Sovereignty

As Canada gears up for further strategic initiatives, including the imminent throne speech by King Charles III, the current diplomatic maneuvering is seen as both a symbolic and pragmatic first step. The intention is not only to safeguard Canada’s sovereignty but also to recalibrate and modernize its trade and security policies in a way that reflects current global realities.

The coming weeks and months are expected to feature more detailed discussions and perhaps formal negotiations. Carney’s performance in Washington and the reaffirmed commitment to a balanced relationship with the U.S. have certainly set the stage for an intriguing period of diplomatic engagement. However, the true measure of success will come when tangible outcomes—such as tariff reductions and new trade agreements—begin to materialize, thereby alleviating the economic challenges currently faced by Canadian industries.

Conclusion

While no single meeting can resolve the complexities of Canada-U.S. relations, the Trump-Carney encounter has undeniably redefined the conversation. With a blend of personal chemistry and pragmatic diplomacy, this meeting has set a new tone—a tone that is both respectful of national sovereignty and realistic about economic challenges. As both countries navigate the aftermath of recent political shifts and global economic pressures, the emphasis on foundational trust and strategic negotiation will likely be the guiding principles for all future engagements.

This fresh start, as articulated by both Carney and Joly, signals that while the path ahead may be fraught with challenges, it is also paved with opportunities for meaningful and balanced progress.